Maverick
Ford · on record 1994 to 2025
The Ford Maverick was used in Europe for Ford 4 wheel drives related first to the Nissan Terrano II and later to the Ford Escape, so the name spans 2 distinct SUV generations. Owners generally chose the Maverick for its blend of family practicality, image and the extra versatility associated with an SUV or crossover. The Maverick can remain useful long after its first ownership cycle, so condition, parts support and continued demand for its utility increasingly decide which examples stay on the road.
VULNERABLE
Red List classification, from population, five year trajectory and survival against peak. Reviewed each census.
229
licensed vehicles
2025 census
2025 census
1.3% of the peak fleet remains licensed
1,720
declared SORN
total surviving
peak 18,210 in 2004 · −126 vehicles a year, five year trend
Population history
Licensed and SORN vehicles at each census. The filters below apply to the family population, MOT and registration figures. They do not alter the generation history above.
Licensed
SORN
Latest census observation
At the average decline recorded over the latest five years, the licensed fleet would reach zero around 2026.
Illustrative projection only; vehicle populations rarely decline linearly. Late fleets typically flatten as surviving examples enter preservation.
Inside the surviving fleet
AutoCensus parses every DVLA variant description, so the fleet can be read by fuel and specification rather than as one number.
First registrations by year
When surviving examples first joined the British fleet.
Recent UK first registrations
This family is no longer sold new. These figures are imports and historic vehicles joining the British register for the first time.
MOT reliability
DVSA test results for this family, 2005 to 2025.
Pass rate by year
| Failure reason | Failures | Share of all tests |
|---|---|---|
| A rigid brake pipe excessively chafed, corroded or damaged | 13,844 | 8.3% |
| Deliberate modification which significantly reduces the original strength, excessive corrosion, severe distortion, a fracture or an inadequate repair of a load bearing member or its supporting structure or panelling within 30 cms of a seat belt ancho | 11,147 | 6.7% |
| Excessive play in a ball joint | 9,507 | 5.7% |
| The grooves of the tread pattern are not at least 1.6mm throughout a continuous band comprising the central three-quarters of the breadth of tread, and round the entire outer circumference of the tyre | 6,980 | 4.2% |
| A major leak of exhaust gases from any part of the system | 6,980 | 4.2% |
| Any deliberate modification, excessive corrosion, damage, cracks or inadequate repair of a load bearing body or chassis member which seriously affects its strength within 30cm of the body mountings | 6,847 | 4.1% |
| Deliberate modification which significantly reduces the original strength, excessive corrosion, severe distortion, a fracture or an inadequate repair of a load bearing member or its supporting structure or supporting panelling within 30cm of any sub- | 5,921 | 3.6% |
| A wiper blade insecure, missing or in such a condition that it does not clear the windscreen effectively to give the driver an adequate view of the road (through the windscreen) to the left and right sides of the vehicle, as well as to the front | 5,532 | 3.3% |
Counted across every recorded test, 2005 to 2025. Advisories are excluded.
Where the Maverick remains
Based on MOT test locations, 2025. Test location is a proxy: a vehicle is counted where it was last tested, not where it is kept.
| Postcode area | Vehicles tested | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| IP | 13 | 77% |
| CM | 10 | 80% |
| CT | 9 | 44% |
| CO | 9 | 56% |
| BA | 8 | 62% |
| BH | 8 | 50% |
| SS | 8 | 100% |
| GU | 7 | 71% |
| TN | 7 | 57% |
| RM | 6 | 67% |
| NN | 6 | 67% |
| N | 6 | 50% |
| SO | 6 | 83% |
| CV | 6 | 50% |
| TA | 5 | 60% |
| KT | 5 | 80% |
| S | 5 | 60% |
| NR | 5 | 60% |
| BR | 5 | 60% |
| PO | 5 | 80% |
| B | 5 | 80% |
| RH | 5 | 60% |
| CR | 5 | 100% |
| HP | 5 | 40% |
| BN | 5 | 80% |
| CF | 5 | 80% |
| M | 4 | 75% |
| ME | 4 | 75% |
| EX | 4 | 50% |
| LE | 4 | 75% |
| DA | 4 | 75% |
| CA | 4 | 75% |
| CW | 4 | 50% |
| MK | 4 | 75% |
| BS | 4 | 50% |
| DY | 3 | 67% |
| SG | 3 | 67% |
| TQ | 3 | 67% |
| DN | 3 | 67% |
| SY | 3 | 67% |
| E | 3 | 67% |
| YO | 3 | 67% |
| L | 3 | 67% |
| NG | 3 | 67% |
| CH | 3 | 67% |
| PE | 3 | 100% |
| OX | 3 | 67% |
| WS | 3 | 33% |
| DE | 3 | 67% |
| SP | 3 | 67% |
| HR | 3 | 67% |
| DD | 3 | 67% |
| CB | 3 | 67% |
| SA | 2 | 50% |
| IV | 2 | 50% |
| RG | 2 | 50% |
| PL | 2 | 50% |
| TR | 2 | 50% |
| AB | 2 | 50% |
| LN | 2 | 50% |
| LS | 2 | 100% |
| AL | 2 | 100% |
| BD | 2 | 100% |
| WD | 2 | 50% |
| HG | 2 | 100% |
| NE | 2 | 50% |
| IG | 2 | 100% |
| WV | 1 | 100% |
| TW | 1 | 100% |
| SL | 1 | 100% |
| FY | 1 | 0% |
| LA | 1 | 100% |
| HD | 1 | 100% |
| LU | 1 | 100% |
| GL | 1 | 100% |
| SE | 1 | 100% |
| PR | 1 | 100% |
| SN | 1 | 100% |
| HA | 1 | 100% |
| EH | 1 | 100% |
| LL | 1 | 100% |
| WA | 1 | 100% |
| DH | 1 | 100% |
How this record was calculated
LATEST CENSUS2025
POPULATION SOURCEDVLA VEH0220 annual
HISTORY SOURCEDVLA VEH0120 GB · to 2013
MOT SOURCEDVSA results · to 2025
FAMILY DEFINITIONFORD MAVERICK
PROCESSED20 Sep 2026
Full methodology
Population history combines DVLA VEH0120 Q4 census observations through 2013 with the annual VEH0220 census from 2014 onward. Figures before 2014 cover Great Britain only. Historical VEH0120 is used only when its overlapping UK observations reconcile to the current canonical family definition. Vehicles are grouped into this family using the DVLA GenModel together with durable routing rules for known inconsistencies.
Variant figures are parsed from raw DVLA model descriptions and the original string is always retained. Configuration is only assigned where the model description explicitly identifies it; a blank configuration is not treated as a two door Wrangler. Blank transmission fields are shown as manual because DVLA records the field for automatic vehicles.
MOT figures count tests, not vehicles, and geographic figures count each vehicle at its most recent test location. The decline projection is a straight line fitted to the latest five years and is illustrative only.